A plot of Islam to launch simultaneous armed raids in major cities of Fourth Reich(EU) has been uncovered. The attacks, planned from Pakistan and being tracked by anti-terrorism agencies, have advanced to a planning stage. Details of the plan originate from the interrogation of a German Islamoterrorist held in Afghanistan. Islamoterrorists were plotting a string of armed raids similar to those in the Indian city of Mumbai in 2008.
Mulims were planning to take Fourthreichians hostage and murder them in a similar manner to the Indian attacks, in which Pakistani militants attacked two hotels and killed 173 people using guns and grenades. The German suspect, being held at Bagram Air Base near Kabul, had been arrested in summer, while on his way back to Europe.
Islamoterrorism impacts Fourthreichian politics. Two center-right Dutch political parties have reached agreement for a minority government with support from Geert Wilders' anti-Islam PVV Freedom party, ending months of political limbo. VVD leader Mark Rutte will become the Netherland's next prime minister. A formal coalition agreement would be signed this Wednesday and presented to Queen Beatrix this Thursday.
Elections four months ago gave seats to 10 different parties and failed to produce a majority on either side of the political spectrum. The VVD won the most seats, 31 out of 150, largely on a platform of cutting the budget to shore up economic confidence, while the PVV won 24 seats and the CDA won 21. The coalition would be the country's first minority government since 1939.
Geert Wilders points out Koran is the Islamic Mein Kampf that incites Muslims to resort to violence. Koran calls for hatred, misogyny, polygyny, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. Koran calls for Muslims to kill infidels, to terrorize infidels, and to fulfil their duty to wage war, the violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every motherfucker Muslim ape, Islam is to rule the world by the sword. Koran is clearly antisemitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs.
Wilders declares September 11 is the international Koran-burning day. After studying Islam's 1400-year bloody history, knowing Koran's content in its best of details, and the sufferance humanity continues to suffer because of this unholy book, we assert this is one book-burning that humanity would not regret, but would deem it a blessing down the years. The myriad deaths and other sufferings and inequities due to Koran is a reason good enough to justify the burning of this most horrendous book existing on Earth today. But if you insist on burning the Koran because of the radical elements of Islam, then in all fairness, you must also burn the bible because of the radical elements of Christianity. In other words, all religious texts should be burned, because every religion known to humankind has radical elements.
Basil Venitis, twitter.com/Venitis, notes the idea of a separation of Mosque and State is unheard of in Islam. Islam has a doctrine of warfare, Jihad, which is fought in order to establish Sharia Law, which is, by nature, totalitarian. Sharia Law calls for, among other freakish things, the dehumanization of women, the flogging/stoning/killing of adulterers, and the killing of homosexuals, apostates, and critics of Islam. All of this is part of orthodox Islam, not some extremist form of it. If jihadists were actually perverting a great religion, Muslims would have been able to discredit them on Islamic grounds and they would have done so by now. The reason they can't is because jihadists are acting according to Koran: When you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads until you have made a great slaughter among them. Ch. 47:4
Wilders asserts Mohammed was a charlatan, a bipolar maniac, a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and a misogynist. Islamic tradition tells us how Mohammed had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side. Here is an emoticon of Mohammed with a lit bomb in his turban *-O)):-{>
Islam is not a religion, but a satanic terrorist cacoculture. Sure, it has a grudge-collecting god, and an afterlife with 72 virgins for each martyr. But in its essence, Islam is a totalitarian ideology and sadomasochism. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means submission. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is the incivility of terrorist jihad and sharia.
Islamic totalitarianism is potentially far more dangerous than either the Nazi or Communist variety, since the latter, despite their exterminating follies, presupposed their own preservation. For the Nazi, the inferior race does not deserve to exist; for the Stalinist, a capitalist does not merit to continue living; for the Islamist, it is the world itself that does not deserve to exist. When someone tells you he is going to kill you, believe him.
Wilders asserts Islam and Nazism share fundamental ideological tenets and premises. It is no coincidence that Islam is compatible with Nazism. Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem agreed wholeheartedly on that point. That agreement was not confined exclusively to their mutual hatred of Jews. The Grand Mufti envied Hitler for the whole of his ideology and for having brought it to fruition.
We detest Islam because it is one of the most degrading evil collectivist creeds in existence. We detest it for all the crimes it has committed throughout history, more than the atrocities committed by any religious creed. We understand the sensitivities and emotions of all their victims. So, if that is bigotry, we will make the most of it. For Islam is distinct from all other creeds for the reason that it is, from top to bottom, virulently antilife.
Venitis asserts that Fourth Reich(EU) should understand and lock horns with an ideology, masquerading as a religion, and rein in Muslims who seek to turn Europe into Eurabia, a theocratic state run by Mullahs and those who wield the sword of Islam. Europe is under threat because European tolerance and European generosity towards those of other countries and cultures are being used by intolerant people, in order to promote intolerance. This is a weakness which can be exploited by them for only so long.
Violence and denial of human rights prevail in Islam. Practices such as stoning of adulterous women, beheadings, execution of apostates, honor killings, hanging of homosexuals, forced child marriages, female circumcision and other odious practices prevail to this day. There is a disgusting hypocritical political correctness relating to Islam that has enveloped Europe. Islam is the Trojan horse in Europe, and if we do not stop Islamification now, Eurabia will just be a matter of time.
Venitis asserts that veil and headscarf are not welcome in Fourth Reich(EU), because they are symbols of women's subservience, repression, incivility, and an increasingly divided Fourth Reich. Veil and headscarf make women invisible, transfoms women to zombies, invalidate women's participatory rights, flag women as evil temptresses, oppress women with barbarity, are brands of misogynist Islam, are mobile prisons, and are a security threat.
The headscarf is more than just a piece of fabric, more than just another article of clothing, and definitely not some hip lifestyle accessory that heavily made-up girls should use to add a little color to their wardrobe. No, the headscarf is a flag and symbol of Islam. Teachers are no longer allowed to wear the head scarf in European public schools, and now girls should be forbidden to wear it as well. Only this forceful act would finally give a Muslim young woman the chance to move with freedom and equality, at least within the confines of the schoolyard.
The wearing of the headscarf, which turns the girls into strangers who are cut off socially and limited physically, comes along with a whole array of special treatments that their parents demand from the school. It is always a question of dividing the sexes, giving girls special dispensation from swimming class or gym class, from school trips, and from sex education classes.
Muslims are on the march in Europe. And the real problem is the systematic undermining of Graecoroman educational apparatus and the legal system. When religion rules over the state and society, we no longer move in the realm of possibility. We can't ask questions. Only through separation of religion and state is it possible to find common ground. Should a headscarf ban in schools ever make it into the lawbooks, there will be plenty of opportunity to discuss the banning of symbols from other religions. There is already a legal decision that bans the display of Christian crosses in schools, but in practice, its effects have been marginal.
Venitis notes that diapered Rubenesques, the Islamic zombies, show the misogyny of Islam. Europeans cannot tolerate the burqa, an outer garment covering a woman from head to toe with just a mesh screen to look through , and the niqab, similar to a burqa but with a slit for the eyes instead of mesh, as oppressive to women. The burqa and niqab confiscate a woman's existence, and they are a sign of enslavement and debasement. Those who wear them are victims, zombified by Islamofascists. EU favors banning these coffins for women's basic liberties. The burqa and niqab are proof of the presence of Muslim fundamentalists on Fourth Reich soil and of the politicization of Islam.
Thilo Sarrazin's book Deutschland schafft sich ab, Germany abolishes itself, shows that higher fertility rates would allow Muslims to dominate Fourth Reich in the not-too-distant future. The book tapped into fears among many Fourthreichians that the Graecoroman culture is in danger. Culture is constantly in flux, and demographic changes bring cultural shifts with them. Islam overtaking the Graecoroman culture will bring a quantum discontinuity of our evolution downwards and the loss of our freedom.
Sarrazin points out Muslims sponge off Fourth Reich(EU), are incapable of integrating themselves into Fourthreichian society, and constantly produce little girls in headscarves. Muslims have no productive function other than in groceries, dumb down society, and are conquering Fourth Reich through a higher birthrate. Muslims are taking over France, Germany, Vardaska, Bosnia, West Thrace, and Cyprus exactly as Albanians took over Kosovo, via a higher birth rate.
Sarrazin notes Fourth Reich's Muslim immigrant families have profited from social welfare payments to a far greater degree than they have contributed to Fourthreichian prosperity. Muslim immigrants would rather work under the table than legally. The much higher birth rates of Muslims will result in a Muslim population overtaking that of Fourth Reich's autochthonous population in two centuries.
Sarrazin's particular brand of ethnic hyperbole is both articulate and honest, and many of the fears he plays on have long found a place in CDU discourse. Friedrich Merz kicked off an immigration debate by calling for newcomers to adhere to a German Leitkultur, leading culture, a term that many felt denigrated other cultures. Juergen Ruettgers coined the term Kinder statt Inder, children instead of Indians, in protest against a center-left plan to ease immigration rules for IT experts from India and elsewhere. Roland Koch kicked off yet another immigration debate by making the overabundance of criminal young foreigners a key element of his rhetoric.
Conditions in areas like Berlin's Kreuzberg ghetto give rise to very real, justified concerns. There are schoolrooms where three-quarters of the students are from immigrant families, students whose German is barely good enough to get by. There are Turkish, Arab, and Albanian family clans that control crime syndicates and receive welfare benefits. There are phenomena like forced marriages and honor killings. In some mosques, imams are encouraging the faithful to engage in Islamist terror. A tsunami of Islamization is sweeping across our continent. Fourthreichians don't want their grandchildren to live in a mostly Muslim country where Turkish and Arabic are widely spoken, women wear headscarves, and the day's rhythm is determined by the call of the muezzin.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan angers many Germans whenever he warns Turkish immigrants against assimilation in Germany. He calls assimilation a crime against humanity! Erdogan demands Turcogermans to stay in their ghettos away from Germans, speak only Turkish, import wives from Turkey, and make many children, in order to outnumber Germans in two centuries. Erdogan demands Turcoghettos to become babymills! There are obligatory German language courses for foreigners who collect social welfare, but most Turks who are required to take the language courses to improve their opportunities on the labor market, either don't attend classes or quit them early.
Turkey is trying to maintain its influence over imams in Germany and, therefore, on immigrants of Turkish descent through its Directorate of Religious Affairs(Diyanet). Year after year, Diyanet sends hundreds of Turkish civil servants to work as imams in the 896 Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs(DITIB) communities in Germany. In their sermons on Turkish holidays and their patriotic speeches, they often reinforce the immigrants' ties to their former homeland.
Sarrazin is being pilloried over his polemic chastising of Muslims, but there are a few things his critics clearly fail to understand. You can't cast away what the man embodies, the anger of a German people who are tired of being cursed at when they offer to help foreigners to integrate.
