[kitchencabinetforum] PERSECUTION AND PROSECUTION GALORE

Eurokleptocrats are in cahoots with Orthodox mafias and Orthodox oligarchs. The
three main Orthodox mafias are the Tambov gang from St. Petersburg and
Izmaylovskaya gang and Solntsevskaya Brotherhood from Moscow. Their activities
focus on political corruption, church corruption, protection money, blackmail,
drugs trade, shipping, commodity trade, and natural resources. Orthodoxy's
circle of tycoons, such as aluminium magnate Oleg Deripaska, banking magnate
Vitaly Malkin, and shipping magnates, have been investigated by Europol for
involvement in crimes of Eurokleptocrats. Russokleptocrats use the Orthodox
Church to control Putinlandians and influence Orthodox Christians all over the world.

Dmitry Medvedev points out three centuries ago Peter the Great founded a new state institution intended to supervise adherence to the law in the Russian Empire. Since then, the functions and powers of the public prosecution office have gone through various changes and even its name was sometimes different so the office has not always had the name that it has today. But nevertheless, the key component has remained intact, the public prosecution office's mission to ensure the rule of law, to guarantee and protect the rights and freedoms of every individual and every citizen.

The current double-headed eagle of President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister
Vladimir Putin has become increasingly authoritarian. Despite numerous
commitments under international law, the government has tightened controls on
political life, civil society, and the media. Disruption of political
opposition's activities, restricting access to state-controlled TV, human right
violations, such as the beating of demonstrators who support the Russian
constitution, murder of journalists and anti-corruption activists, disappearance
and torture, abuse of the legal system for monetary and political gain, all
illustrate this negative trend. Putin, a former penniless KGB agent, is now
billionaire, thanks to kickbacks!

Medvedev believes the current generation of prosecutors is continuing the traditions of its predecessors commendably. Many of Medvedev's personal friends work as prosecutors so Medvedev knows firsthand how difficult and demanding this job is.

Basil Venitis, venitis@gmail.com, points out the governments of Putinland and Greece have invented a way of terrorizing dissident bloggers with frivolous charge stacking and perpetual delay of justice. The government accuses a dissident blogger with many charges, including treason, in order to intimidate the blogger. Besides, a charge might stick like throwing spaghetti on the wall. Moreover, no accuser shows up during the trial, the judge postpones the trial for another six months, and so it goes ad infinitum in order to break the nerves of the blogger in a perpetual sequence of agony, huge legal expenses, and humiliation.

Medvedev notes the Putinlandian public prosecution office is one of the most important elements in the Putinlandian governance system. It makes a significant input into developing the modern democratic state in Putinland, strengthening law and order, and protecting the rights of the people of Putinland. Its powers are also changing. Prosecutors are actively involved in criminal prosecution, while their powers, tasks and functions of protecting the interests of individuals, as well as the interests of socially valuable organisations and entities, and especially of socially vulnerable categories of the population have been expanded, which is of major importance given the current situation in the country.

Venitis asserts that only Anglosphere has real justice. Greece has the worst justice in Fourth Reich, easily manipulated by the kangaroo government. Greek justice is a spider web, catching small prey and swallowing them, while allowing crocodiles to
penetrate and dominate it. Visiting Greek prisons, one could see all lesmiserables that fill them up, but he could not find any kleptocrats.

Medvedev asserts it is extremely important to continue using the potential and experience of the Putinlandian prosecution office more effectively, including when it comes to shaping legal policy, preventing crime, and educating, in terms of law observance, the society, all of the social groups and certainly the young people.

Russokleptocrats and Graecokleptocrats enjoy impunity, whereas citizens suffer from perjury. Police
thugs are the main perjurers. Prosecutors lie like hell! Freak galore!
Public prosecutors pick up either very easy targets of poor people who cannot
afford defense to justify a quota system or very large targets to get publicity.
Prosecuting famous bloggers brings a lot of publicity to machiavellian
kleptocrats, pusillanimous prosecutors, and bumptious cybercops. Brutal cybercops must be abolished now.

As Medvedev strives to improve the performance of the public prosecution office, he is constantly taking into account global experience, foreign experience, as well as documents adopted by international organisations, including international and regional associations such as the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Council of Europe, and the International Association of Prosecutors.

Putinland and Greece have become kangaroo valleys, violating basic human rights and Article 2 of the Lisbon Treaty, but nobody gives a damn. We cannot understand why the European Commission tolerates political persecution and freakish Kangaroo Justice within the borders of the European Union and cannot refer the Greek government to the Court of Justice of the European Union. We cannot understand why the European Commission cannot protect Greeks from appalling violations of Article 2 of the Lisbon Treaty by the Greek government. If the European Union cannot protect Greeks from the repressive Greek government, who will? http://venitism.blogspot.com

Medvedev welcomes the development of recommendations by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to its member states on the prosecutors' role outside the criminal prosecution system. The European prosecutors should have well defined standards, modern standards of prosecutorial activity in all areas where their efforts may be applied, in all spheres of social relationships. Medvedev hopes this work will also be completed soon.

The governments of Putinland and Greece use charge stacking to persecute dissident bloggers. Charge stacking is the ability to charge a large number of overlapping crimes for a single course of conduct. Combining crimes enables prosecutors to get convictions in cases where there is no misconduct at all. By stacking enough charges, including treason, prosecutors jack up the threat value of a trial against a dissident blogger, even if the government's case is very weak. Charge stacking is terror. The government cannot terrorize the people. http://venitism.blogspot.com

Persecuting dissident bloggers, the Greek government violates Article 2 of the Lisbon Treaty, which states the European Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law, and respect for human rights. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, nondiscrimination, tolerance, and justice prevail.

Overcriminalization provides prosecutors with unfettered control over broad
swaths of criminal adjudication and legislative interpretation. The
proliferation of vague and overly broad laws has given prosecutors the ability
to stack criminal charges against defendants in a way that diminishes the
likelihood of a criminal trial and increases the probability of either a guilty
plea or a jury verdict.

Overcriminalization gives prosecutors vast latitude to secure guilty verdicts.
In the interpretive context, the proliferation of vague and overbroad criminal
laws has given prosecutors the ability to apply vague, overly broad criminal
laws to a vast array of conduct. The prosecutor essentially becomes a lawmaker,
providing meaning and context to an otherwise open-ended statute or regulation.

The unprincipled growth of criminal law has also led to the inappropriate
delegation of legislative authority to the judicial branch. Judges often must
take it upon themselves to create meaning from vague, unbounded criminal
offenses such as the honest services fraud statute. When interpreting the large
number of imprecise and unclear mens rea (criminal-intent) requirements in
statutory and regulatory criminal offenses, judges are essentially co-opted into
rewriting the laws and finding meaning where there is none.

There are judicially created safeguards that courts could and should apply to
grant the benefit of the doubt to a person accused of a vague, ambiguous, or
overly broad criminal law. These safeguards include the constitutional
void-for-vagueness doctrine that the Supreme Court used to narrow the honest
services fraud statute as well as the common-law rule of lenity.